<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 230 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned a 6-day appeal filing delay attributed to a mistake by the CA. The case involved service tax demand based on accrual income, with discrepancies in payments leading to penalties for non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized prompt tax payment upon consideration receipt, highlighting the obligation to remit taxes timely. Due to record insufficiencies, the matter was remanded for further review. The Tribunal stressed the need for a 25% penalty pre-deposit for compliance and accurate reporting, enforcing penalties for non-compliance. Compliance with legal requirements and financial transparency were underscored for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 230 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned a 6-day appeal filing delay attributed to a mistake by the CA. The case involved service tax demand based on accrual income, with discrepancies in payments leading to penalties for non-compliance. The Tribunal emphasized prompt tax payment upon consideration receipt, highlighting the obligation to remit taxes timely. Due to record insufficiencies, the matter was remanded for further review. The Tribunal stressed the need for a 25% penalty pre-deposit for compliance and accurate reporting, enforcing penalties for non-compliance. Compliance with legal requirements and financial transparency were underscored for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>