<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 229 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the waiver of penalty under Section 80 of the Finance Act by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal found the respondent&#039;s explanations satisfactory, noting the minimal impact of the demand compared to total tax payments. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the significance of demonstrating reasonable cause for failures in tax compliance to potentially avoid penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 229 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the waiver of penalty under Section 80 of the Finance Act by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal found the respondent&#039;s explanations satisfactory, noting the minimal impact of the demand compared to total tax payments. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the significance of demonstrating reasonable cause for failures in tax compliance to potentially avoid penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>