<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 226 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250276</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore upheld the Department&#039;s decision to disallow Cenvat credit on &quot;erection, installation and commissioning service,&quot; demand interest under section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, and impose a penalty under rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding interest and penalty unjustified, affirming the original authority&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 12:13:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 226 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250276</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore upheld the Department&#039;s decision to disallow Cenvat credit on &quot;erection, installation and commissioning service,&quot; demand interest under section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, and impose a penalty under rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding interest and penalty unjustified, affirming the original authority&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>