<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250268</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning cenvat credit eligibility for raw materials used in auto parts manufacturing. Despite discrepancies in the description of goods in the invoices, the tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s receipt and utilization of the materials should determine eligibility for credit. The tribunal emphasized that changing descriptions from wire rods to steel rods or steel rounds did not justify denying the credit. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 218 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250268</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning cenvat credit eligibility for raw materials used in auto parts manufacturing. Despite discrepancies in the description of goods in the invoices, the tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s receipt and utilization of the materials should determine eligibility for credit. The tribunal emphasized that changing descriptions from wire rods to steel rods or steel rounds did not justify denying the credit. As a result, the appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>