<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 213 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in favor of the Respondent in a dispute over the calculation of export duty on iron-ore fines. It ruled that duty should be charged based on dry weight per metric ton as per the contract terms, rendering the Revenue&#039;s Appeals meritless. The Tribunal also affirmed the interpretation of contract terms for determining FOB value and assessable value, ordering a refund of duties paid on short-shipped quantities. The judgment emphasized adherence to contract terms for duty calculation, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenges and upholding the Commissioner&#039;s Order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 213 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in favor of the Respondent in a dispute over the calculation of export duty on iron-ore fines. It ruled that duty should be charged based on dry weight per metric ton as per the contract terms, rendering the Revenue&#039;s Appeals meritless. The Tribunal also affirmed the interpretation of contract terms for determining FOB value and assessable value, ordering a refund of duties paid on short-shipped quantities. The judgment emphasized adherence to contract terms for duty calculation, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenges and upholding the Commissioner&#039;s Order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>