<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250261</link>
    <description>Mobile handsets were not liable to confiscation under the import prohibition because the goods admittedly carried IMEI numbers, and the policy barred only handsets without IMEI numbers or with all-zero IMEI. The customs objection that the IMEI numbers were allotted to other brands did not, on these facts, establish breach of the prohibition or justify treating the consignment as prohibited goods. In the absence of material showing that the imported handsets fell within the banned category, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were not sustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 211 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250261</link>
      <description>Mobile handsets were not liable to confiscation under the import prohibition because the goods admittedly carried IMEI numbers, and the policy barred only handsets without IMEI numbers or with all-zero IMEI. The customs objection that the IMEI numbers were allotted to other brands did not, on these facts, establish breach of the prohibition or justify treating the consignment as prohibited goods. In the absence of material showing that the imported handsets fell within the banned category, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were not sustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>