https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250258 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the communication/order dated 27.03.2014 by the Assessing Officer (AO) as illegal and arbitrary. The court directed compliance with the Commissioner's directions, disapproved of coercive recovery measures, and criticized the delay in the appeal process. It emphasized adherence to legal procedures, set aside the impugned order, and instructed timely disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. en-us Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250258 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the communication/order dated 27.03.2014 by the Assessing Officer (AO) as illegal and arbitrary. The court directed compliance with the Commissioner's directions, disapproved of coercive recovery measures, and criticized the delay in the appeal process. It emphasized adherence to legal procedures, set aside the impugned order, and instructed timely disposal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250258