<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 117 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165677</link>
    <description>The appellate collector allowed the appeal in a case concerning the classification and valuation of exported goods as jute specialities eligible for duty exemption under Notification No. 49-Cus. The appellant successfully argued for the goods&#039; qualification as jute specialities, pointing out errors in the original order and providing supporting evidence. Emphasis was placed on verifying goods&#039; identity to prevent misclassification, and the collector suggested considering international prices for valuation. Criticism was directed at the Customs House for not confirming goods&#039; identity pre-shipment. The lack of evidence of fraudulent or incorrect declared value favored the appellants, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 117 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165677</link>
      <description>The appellate collector allowed the appeal in a case concerning the classification and valuation of exported goods as jute specialities eligible for duty exemption under Notification No. 49-Cus. The appellant successfully argued for the goods&#039; qualification as jute specialities, pointing out errors in the original order and providing supporting evidence. Emphasis was placed on verifying goods&#039; identity to prevent misclassification, and the collector suggested considering international prices for valuation. Criticism was directed at the Customs House for not confirming goods&#039; identity pre-shipment. The lack of evidence of fraudulent or incorrect declared value favored the appellants, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>