<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 124 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165671</link>
    <description>Where the final excise assessment had not been completed, the refund limitation period was not treated as expired merely because the accounting year had ended. The assessee could not be said to have lost the opportunity to claim refund before the final liability was known, so the limitation objection failed and the claim was held to be within time. The appellate order was set aside and refund was directed to be sanctioned if otherwise in order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 12:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 124 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165671</link>
      <description>Where the final excise assessment had not been completed, the refund limitation period was not treated as expired merely because the accounting year had ended. The assessee could not be said to have lost the opportunity to claim refund before the final liability was known, so the limitation objection failed and the claim was held to be within time. The appellate order was set aside and refund was directed to be sanctioned if otherwise in order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>