<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cenvat Credit</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107129</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on structural items (columns, beams, MS plates, pipes) is disputed by the department as not qualifying as capital goods under Rule 2, the assessee contends those items are part of sand plant machinery used in manufacturing castings and advisers recommend preparing a detailed, precedent based reply addressing disallowance, limitation, bona fide belief, interest and penalty, and consulting a tax expert for drafting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:14:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cenvat Credit</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107129</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on structural items (columns, beams, MS plates, pipes) is disputed by the department as not qualifying as capital goods under Rule 2, the assessee contends those items are part of sand plant machinery used in manufacturing castings and advisers recommend preparing a detailed, precedent based reply addressing disallowance, limitation, bona fide belief, interest and penalty, and consulting a tax expert for drafting.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:14:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>