<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 158 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the interest charged under sections 234B and 234C. It emphasized that the assessee should not be penalized for failing to fulfill a requirement that did not exist in law at the relevant time, based on established legal principles and prior judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 158 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the interest charged under sections 234B and 234C. It emphasized that the assessee should not be penalized for failing to fulfill a requirement that did not exist in law at the relevant time, based on established legal principles and prior judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>