https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250203 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication regarding mis-declaration of consumers' category under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E., emphasizing the Commissioner's error in not considering supporting documents. Additionally, the Tribunal directed a comprehensive review of the assessment of Tariff rate for clearances made without affixing MRP on cement bags, highlighting the necessity to properly evaluate the duty calculation and quantification of differential duty. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of a thorough reevaluation process considering all relevant evidence and legal precedents for a fair adjudication. en-us Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250203 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication regarding mis-declaration of consumers' category under Notification No. 4/2006-C.E., emphasizing the Commissioner's error in not considering supporting documents. Additionally, the Tribunal directed a comprehensive review of the assessment of Tariff rate for clearances made without affixing MRP on cement bags, highlighting the necessity to properly evaluate the duty calculation and quantification of differential duty. The impugned order was set aside, emphasizing the importance of a thorough reevaluation process considering all relevant evidence and legal precedents for a fair adjudication. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250203