<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250201</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on the respondent, emphasizing that the facts did not support the application of Section 73(4) of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment underscores the significance of assessing the unique circumstances of each case in determining the applicability of penalty provisions in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 151 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250201</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on the respondent, emphasizing that the facts did not support the application of Section 73(4) of the Finance Act, 1994. The judgment underscores the significance of assessing the unique circumstances of each case in determining the applicability of penalty provisions in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>