<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 147 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250197</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to Break Bulk Fees (BBF) due to misclassification and lack of notice consistency. Verification of the deposit amount and consequential penalties was directed, emphasizing the need for proper verification and adherence to procedural requirements. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the demand under cargo handling service being deemed beyond the scope of the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 147 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250197</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand related to Break Bulk Fees (BBF) due to misclassification and lack of notice consistency. Verification of the deposit amount and consequential penalties was directed, emphasizing the need for proper verification and adherence to procedural requirements. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the demand under cargo handling service being deemed beyond the scope of the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>