<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 144 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250194</link>
    <description>Importing helium in insulated tanks, paying rent for the tanks, and handling unloading, transport and inventory at the importer&#039;s premises was not treated as storage and warehousing service for reverse charge service tax. The relevant test was whether the foreign supplier, as a storage keeper, provided warehousing functions such as security, stacking, loading and unloading; mere renting of tanks or space was insufficient. On the admitted facts, the supplier had no control over the tanks after shipment and the importer undertook the handling and stock-keeping at its factory. The arrangement was therefore characterised as tank rental rather than taxable warehousing service, and service tax under reverse charge did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 144 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250194</link>
      <description>Importing helium in insulated tanks, paying rent for the tanks, and handling unloading, transport and inventory at the importer&#039;s premises was not treated as storage and warehousing service for reverse charge service tax. The relevant test was whether the foreign supplier, as a storage keeper, provided warehousing functions such as security, stacking, loading and unloading; mere renting of tanks or space was insufficient. On the admitted facts, the supplier had no control over the tanks after shipment and the importer undertook the handling and stock-keeping at its factory. The arrangement was therefore characterised as tank rental rather than taxable warehousing service, and service tax under reverse charge did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>