<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 for contravening the Central Excise Act and Rules, as there was no intent to evade duty and the duty liability and interest were paid before the Show Cause Notice. The decision emphasized the necessity of meeting Section 11AC requirements for penalty imposition and aligned with established High Court precedents in similar cases. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 02:30:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 136 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 25 for contravening the Central Excise Act and Rules, as there was no intent to evade duty and the duty liability and interest were paid before the Show Cause Notice. The decision emphasized the necessity of meeting Section 11AC requirements for penalty imposition and aligned with established High Court precedents in similar cases. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty order was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>