<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 126 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, dismissing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s awareness of the contraband nature of goods found on the vessel, supported by statements and lack of retraction, led to the conclusion that the penalty was justified. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s involvement in smuggling activities established, affirming the penalty and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 126 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, dismissing the appeal. The appellant&#039;s awareness of the contraband nature of goods found on the vessel, supported by statements and lack of retraction, led to the conclusion that the penalty was justified. The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s involvement in smuggling activities established, affirming the penalty and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>