https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250175 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application seeking restoration and modification of its order due to failure to deposit the directed amount within the specified time. The appellant's argument that the Director was not specifically directed to deposit the amount was rejected. The Revenue contended that the application was time-barred under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it was filed after the limitation period. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the joint responsibility of both applicants to comply with the deposit requirement. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:45:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250175 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application seeking restoration and modification of its order due to failure to deposit the directed amount within the specified time. The appellant's argument that the Director was not specifically directed to deposit the amount was rejected. The Revenue contended that the application was time-barred under Section 129B(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it was filed after the limitation period. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the joint responsibility of both applicants to comply with the deposit requirement. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250175