https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250159 Two appeals by an individual and a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) against separate orders of the CIT(A) were heard together due to a common issue. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) had dismissed both appeals ex-parte without proper consideration, contrary to the Income Tax Act. The ITAT set aside the orders and remitted the matters back to the CIT(A) for disposal on merit after affording the assessees an opportunity to be heard. Both appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity to present their case. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Aug 2014 01:26:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250159 Two appeals by an individual and a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) against separate orders of the CIT(A) were heard together due to a common issue. The ITAT found that the CIT(A) had dismissed both appeals ex-parte without proper consideration, contrary to the Income Tax Act. The ITAT set aside the orders and remitted the matters back to the CIT(A) for disposal on merit after affording the assessees an opportunity to be heard. Both appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity to present their case. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250159