<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 259 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165635</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal of the appellants concerning the off-season discount, emphasizing that it is a common trade practice in the fan industry. They directed the allowance of an abatement towards publicity expenses, not exceeding the amount claimed by the appellants, pending verification by the Lower Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 259 - APPELLATE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165635</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority allowed the appeal of the appellants concerning the off-season discount, emphasizing that it is a common trade practice in the fan industry. They directed the allowance of an abatement towards publicity expenses, not exceeding the amount claimed by the appellants, pending verification by the Lower Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>