<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 102 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250152</link>
    <description>The court upheld the retrospective amendment imposing service tax on renting of immovable property and clarified the classification of services for tax purposes. It directed DIAL to bear the cost of the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 102 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250152</link>
      <description>The court upheld the retrospective amendment imposing service tax on renting of immovable property and clarified the classification of services for tax purposes. It directed DIAL to bear the cost of the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner. The writ petition was disposed of with each party bearing its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>