https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250136 The court upheld the decision against the appellant in a case involving clandestine removal of goods. Despite arguments of lack of corroborative evidence and discrepancies in stock, the judge found the recovery of diaries and inculpatory statements convincing. The appellant's reliance on case law without substantial evidence was criticized, and the judge dismissed arguments regarding additional evidence not previously raised. The impugned order was deemed legally sound and upheld, with penalties confirmed for the appellant and director. The appeals were rejected, and the decision was rendered on 04.07.2014. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:39:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250136 The court upheld the decision against the appellant in a case involving clandestine removal of goods. Despite arguments of lack of corroborative evidence and discrepancies in stock, the judge found the recovery of diaries and inculpatory statements convincing. The appellant's reliance on case law without substantial evidence was criticized, and the judge dismissed arguments regarding additional evidence not previously raised. The impugned order was deemed legally sound and upheld, with penalties confirmed for the appellant and director. The appeals were rejected, and the decision was rendered on 04.07.2014. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250136