<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 77 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Customs to encash the bank guarantee for the redemption fine and cancel the guarantee for the remaining amount within a month. This decision emphasized compliance with previous orders regarding waiver of pre-deposit and stay against penalties, ensuring the redemption fine&#039;s safeguarding through the bank guarantee. The ruling aimed to streamline the recovery process while protecting the appellant&#039;s interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 77 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Commissioner of Customs to encash the bank guarantee for the redemption fine and cancel the guarantee for the remaining amount within a month. This decision emphasized compliance with previous orders regarding waiver of pre-deposit and stay against penalties, ensuring the redemption fine&#039;s safeguarding through the bank guarantee. The ruling aimed to streamline the recovery process while protecting the appellant&#039;s interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>