<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 76 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250126</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the disallowance of interest deduction on fixed deposits under Section 80V and the disallowance of sales promotion expenses. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of &quot;other place of work&quot; in Explanation 2 to Section 37(2A), ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the Assessee. The High Court disposed of the Income Tax Reference without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:32:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 76 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250126</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding the disallowance of interest deduction on fixed deposits under Section 80V and the disallowance of sales promotion expenses. The Court agreed with the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of &quot;other place of work&quot; in Explanation 2 to Section 37(2A), ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the Assessee. The High Court disposed of the Income Tax Reference without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>