<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 69 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250119</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the reopening of a concluded assessment under section 147, as the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to establish lack of full disclosure by the assessee, rendering the reopening invalid. Consequently, the ITAT did not address the disallowance of royalty expenditure, deeming the reassessment order nonoperational. The appeal was allowed, and the consequential addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 11:19:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 69 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250119</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the reopening of a concluded assessment under section 147, as the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to establish lack of full disclosure by the assessee, rendering the reopening invalid. Consequently, the ITAT did not address the disallowance of royalty expenditure, deeming the reassessment order nonoperational. The appeal was allowed, and the consequential addition was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>