<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (7) TMI 111 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165589</link>
    <description>Lightning arresters sold as finished electrical goods could not be classified as porcelain ware merely because a porcelain shell formed one component of the product. The tariff entry applied to porcelain ware as such, and the department had not established that the assessee manufactured porcelain ware as an independent marketable commodity. The presence of porcelain in the finished article did not make the whole product dutiable under the porcelain ware heading. Relying on earlier tariff construction involving similar use of porcelain components in another electrical article, the court held that excise duty on the porcelain content was unsustainable and set aside the levy in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 12:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (7) TMI 111 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165589</link>
      <description>Lightning arresters sold as finished electrical goods could not be classified as porcelain ware merely because a porcelain shell formed one component of the product. The tariff entry applied to porcelain ware as such, and the department had not established that the assessee manufactured porcelain ware as an independent marketable commodity. The presence of porcelain in the finished article did not make the whole product dutiable under the porcelain ware heading. Relying on earlier tariff construction involving similar use of porcelain components in another electrical article, the court held that excise duty on the porcelain content was unsustainable and set aside the levy in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>