<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (9) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165587</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a Customs Act order was not maintainable because the statute provided an effective appellate remedy under Section 128. The amended Article 226 barred entertainment of such a petition where the alternative remedy existed, and Section 58 of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act caused pending petitions of that kind to abate. On that basis, the petition failed and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 11:59:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (9) TMI 109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165587</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a Customs Act order was not maintainable because the statute provided an effective appellate remedy under Section 128. The amended Article 226 barred entertainment of such a petition where the alternative remedy existed, and Section 58 of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act caused pending petitions of that kind to abate. On that basis, the petition failed and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>