<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (7) TMI 119 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165582</link>
    <description>Excise valuation had to be made on the basis of the factory-gate wholesale cash price, confined to manufacturing cost and manufacturing profit, with post-manufacturing expenses and profits excluded. A price taken from transactions not shown to be at arm&#039;s length, or influenced by extra-commercial considerations, could not automatically be adopted for assessment. The authorities were also held to have jurisdiction under the relevant excise procedure to make a final assessment after clearance and determine duty on that basis. The impugned assessment was quashed in part for applying the wrong valuation test, while a fresh assessment was left open for the remaining clearances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (7) TMI 119 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165582</link>
      <description>Excise valuation had to be made on the basis of the factory-gate wholesale cash price, confined to manufacturing cost and manufacturing profit, with post-manufacturing expenses and profits excluded. A price taken from transactions not shown to be at arm&#039;s length, or influenced by extra-commercial considerations, could not automatically be adopted for assessment. The authorities were also held to have jurisdiction under the relevant excise procedure to make a final assessment after clearance and determine duty on that basis. The impugned assessment was quashed in part for applying the wrong valuation test, while a fresh assessment was left open for the remaining clearances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>