https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250104 The Tribunal declined to condone a delay of one and a half years in seeking an appeal remedy before it, citing the appellant bank's negligence and lack of diligence. Emphasizing the importance of providing reasonable explanations for delays, the Tribunal highlighted that condonation of delay should not be a guaranteed benefit. The judgment underscored the need for public authorities to be vigilant in protecting state interests and cautioned against seeking condonation on flimsy grounds. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed all applications and appeals, prioritizing the protection of Revenue's interests and upholding legal principles. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:53:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250104 The Tribunal declined to condone a delay of one and a half years in seeking an appeal remedy before it, citing the appellant bank's negligence and lack of diligence. Emphasizing the importance of providing reasonable explanations for delays, the Tribunal highlighted that condonation of delay should not be a guaranteed benefit. The judgment underscored the need for public authorities to be vigilant in protecting state interests and cautioned against seeking condonation on flimsy grounds. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed all applications and appeals, prioritizing the protection of Revenue's interests and upholding legal principles. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250104