https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250100 An ex parte Tax Board order was challenged on the ground that it had been passed without service and without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The record showed that the grievance of non-service was not denied in the reply, and the denial of hearing was treated as a breach of natural justice. The merits of the penalty under section 76(6) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were not examined. The High Court held the order unsustainable, set it aside, and remanded the matter to the Tax Board for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Aug 2014 09:46:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250100 An ex parte Tax Board order was challenged on the ground that it had been passed without service and without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The record showed that the grievance of non-service was not denied in the reply, and the denial of hearing was treated as a breach of natural justice. The merits of the penalty under section 76(6) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 were not examined. The High Court held the order unsustainable, set it aside, and remanded the matter to the Tax Board for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250100