https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250080 The Tribunal ruled that total waiver of dues was not justified for two companies seeking relief under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Instead, specific amounts were required to be deposited within a set timeframe to qualify for partial waiver and suspension of recovery for the remaining sums during the appeal process. The judgment addressed issues of waiver eligibility, interpretation of input service distributor rules, undue hardship assessment, timeliness of demands, and adherence to the Supreme Court's undue hardship principles. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 20:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250080 The Tribunal ruled that total waiver of dues was not justified for two companies seeking relief under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Instead, specific amounts were required to be deposited within a set timeframe to qualify for partial waiver and suspension of recovery for the remaining sums during the appeal process. The judgment addressed issues of waiver eligibility, interpretation of input service distributor rules, undue hardship assessment, timeliness of demands, and adherence to the Supreme Court's undue hardship principles. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250080