https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250069 The court upheld the denial of rebate claims by the petitioner due to fraudulent transactions with fake suppliers, lack of physical movement of goods, and non-compliance with Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The petitioner's reliance on non-existent suppliers undermined their claims, leading to the dismissal of the Special Civil Application. en-us Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250069 The court upheld the denial of rebate claims by the petitioner due to fraudulent transactions with fake suppliers, lack of physical movement of goods, and non-compliance with Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The petitioner's reliance on non-existent suppliers undermined their claims, leading to the dismissal of the Special Civil Application. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250069