<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250063</link>
    <description>Bail for NDPS offences involving commercial quantity is governed by the statutory restrictions overriding ordinary bail discretion. Where the prosecution opposes bail, the accused must establish reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty and unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. Statutory presumptions concerning culpable mental state and possession remain relevant unless rebutted. Recovery of charas from a concealed cavity in a family vehicle, coupled with issues requiring trial-stage evidence appraisal, did not displace the statutory bar. The twin conditions for bail were therefore not satisfied, and bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 13 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250063</link>
      <description>Bail for NDPS offences involving commercial quantity is governed by the statutory restrictions overriding ordinary bail discretion. Where the prosecution opposes bail, the accused must establish reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty and unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. Statutory presumptions concerning culpable mental state and possession remain relevant unless rebutted. Recovery of charas from a concealed cavity in a family vehicle, coupled with issues requiring trial-stage evidence appraisal, did not displace the statutory bar. The twin conditions for bail were therefore not satisfied, and bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>