<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 10 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250060</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of 10% of foreign travel expenses and interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found the ITAT&#039;s decisions reasonable and not vitiated by legal errors. The alternative submission regarding interest expenses under Section 57 was not considered as it was not raised before lower authorities. The appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial legal questions were involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 19:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 10 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250060</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of 10% of foreign travel expenses and interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court found the ITAT&#039;s decisions reasonable and not vitiated by legal errors. The alternative submission regarding interest expenses under Section 57 was not considered as it was not raised before lower authorities. The appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial legal questions were involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>