<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165561</link>
    <description>Proforma credit under Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was available for processed vegetable non-essential linseed oil used in making paints and varnishes, even though it passed through the intermediary stage of alkyd resin. The court treated the resin stage as merely incidental, held that the concession could not be denied because the input underwent intermediate processing, and relied on the later governmental clarification supporting exemption for such use. The duty demand was also held time-barred to the extent it related to periods beyond three months, because the short levy was governed by Rule 10 and recovery had to be initiated within the prescribed limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:52:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165561</link>
      <description>Proforma credit under Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was available for processed vegetable non-essential linseed oil used in making paints and varnishes, even though it passed through the intermediary stage of alkyd resin. The court treated the resin stage as merely incidental, held that the concession could not be denied because the input underwent intermediate processing, and relied on the later governmental clarification supporting exemption for such use. The duty demand was also held time-barred to the extent it related to periods beyond three months, because the short levy was governed by Rule 10 and recovery had to be initiated within the prescribed limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>