https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165560 The court held that the demand for excise duty on goods manufactured during the duty-free period was illegal. It quashed the excise duty order, issued a writ of Mandamus restraining the respondents from recovering excise duty, allowed the petitioner to remove the goods without payment of excise duty, and awarded costs to the petitioner. The petitioner was entitled to a refund of the security deposit. en-us Fri, 26 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:46:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165560 The court held that the demand for excise duty on goods manufactured during the duty-free period was illegal. It quashed the excise duty order, issued a writ of Mandamus restraining the respondents from recovering excise duty, allowed the petitioner to remove the goods without payment of excise duty, and awarded costs to the petitioner. The petitioner was entitled to a refund of the security deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165560