<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165551</link>
    <description>Trade tax dues of a public limited company could not be recovered from its directors personally in the absence of statutory authority or material showing fraud, misuse of corporate personality, or other grounds to pierce the corporate veil. The company&#039;s status as a sick industrial company did not itself justify personal recovery against directors. Because no prior investigation or relevant factual basis was shown to disregard the company&#039;s separate legal existence, enforcement against the directors&#039; personal assets was impermissible. The authority could proceed against the company&#039;s assets and take further action only if proper grounds for lifting the corporate veil were established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1036 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165551</link>
      <description>Trade tax dues of a public limited company could not be recovered from its directors personally in the absence of statutory authority or material showing fraud, misuse of corporate personality, or other grounds to pierce the corporate veil. The company&#039;s status as a sick industrial company did not itself justify personal recovery against directors. Because no prior investigation or relevant factual basis was shown to disregard the company&#039;s separate legal existence, enforcement against the directors&#039; personal assets was impermissible. The authority could proceed against the company&#039;s assets and take further action only if proper grounds for lifting the corporate veil were established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>