<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Illicit Removal Charge Dismissed: Appellant&#039;s Payment Under Compounded Levy Scheme Negates Allegations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19506</link>
    <description>The charge of illicit removal cannot be confirmed against the appellant on this factual matrix, which indicate that the appellant to his subsequent application made on 18.05.2001 has paid the duty under the compounded levy scheme - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:33:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:33:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=361002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Illicit Removal Charge Dismissed: Appellant&#039;s Payment Under Compounded Levy Scheme Negates Allegations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19506</link>
      <description>The charge of illicit removal cannot be confirmed against the appellant on this factual matrix, which indicate that the appellant to his subsequent application made on 18.05.2001 has paid the duty under the compounded levy scheme - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:33:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=19506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>