<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1068 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250032</link>
    <description>In NDPS cases involving commercial quantity, Section 37 imposes a statutory bar to bail unless the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. The text explains that where an earlier bail order does not advert to these mandatory twin conditions, and the record indicates conscious possession and disclosure material, the order may be treated as one passed without proper application of the statutory restriction. It distinguishes ordinary cancellation of bail on supervening circumstances from recall of a bail order not sanctioned by law, and states that inherent powers may be invoked to correct such an order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1068 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250032</link>
      <description>In NDPS cases involving commercial quantity, Section 37 imposes a statutory bar to bail unless the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. The text explains that where an earlier bail order does not advert to these mandatory twin conditions, and the record indicates conscious possession and disclosure material, the order may be treated as one passed without proper application of the statutory restriction. It distinguishes ordinary cancellation of bail on supervening circumstances from recall of a bail order not sanctioned by law, and states that inherent powers may be invoked to correct such an order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>