<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250021</link>
    <description>A co-operative credit society was held not to fall within the section 80P(4) exclusion because it was not a co-operative bank, lacking a banking licence and not shown to be a State Co-operative Bank, Central Co-operative Bank, or Primary Co-operative Bank. Merely providing credit facilities to members and earning interest and dividend did not alter its character. On that basis, the society remained eligible for deduction under section 80P, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1057 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250021</link>
      <description>A co-operative credit society was held not to fall within the section 80P(4) exclusion because it was not a co-operative bank, lacking a banking licence and not shown to be a State Co-operative Bank, Central Co-operative Bank, or Primary Co-operative Bank. Merely providing credit facilities to members and earning interest and dividend did not alter its character. On that basis, the society remained eligible for deduction under section 80P, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>