<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1035 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165531</link>
    <description>Non-production of the finished goods stock register justified rejection of the books of account and an estimated addition where the applicable circular required maintenance of that register below the stated turnover limit. In the absence of proper books and the relevant stock records, the assessing authority&#039;s estimation was upheld, and the first appellate authority had already granted partial relief that the Tribunal affirmed. Estimation of turnover was treated as a question of fact, and no legal infirmity or substantial question of law was shown to warrant interference. The revision therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1035 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165531</link>
      <description>Non-production of the finished goods stock register justified rejection of the books of account and an estimated addition where the applicable circular required maintenance of that register below the stated turnover limit. In the absence of proper books and the relevant stock records, the assessing authority&#039;s estimation was upheld, and the first appellate authority had already granted partial relief that the Tribunal affirmed. Estimation of turnover was treated as a question of fact, and no legal infirmity or substantial question of law was shown to warrant interference. The revision therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>