<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1048 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250012</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for a fresh decision on the refund claim based on the applicability of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, following the precedent set in a previous similar case, allowing adjustment of excess service tax paid without a time limit if refund criteria are met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1048 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250012</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the original authority for a fresh decision on the refund claim based on the applicability of Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, following the precedent set in a previous similar case, allowing adjustment of excess service tax paid without a time limit if refund criteria are met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>