<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1044 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250008</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the introduction of additional documents and grounds in the appeal memorandum. The appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for assessed dues was partially granted, with a specific pre-deposit requirement. The tribunal analyzed the franchise agreement terms, focusing on royalty payment, service tax liability, and franchisee obligations. The appellant argued against service tax on royalty, citing case laws and financial hardships. The revenue department contended that royalty should be taxable, raising concerns about disclosure and revenue neutrality. The tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit, subject to compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1044 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250008</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the introduction of additional documents and grounds in the appeal memorandum. The appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for assessed dues was partially granted, with a specific pre-deposit requirement. The tribunal analyzed the franchise agreement terms, focusing on royalty payment, service tax liability, and franchisee obligations. The appellant argued against service tax on royalty, citing case laws and financial hardships. The revenue department contended that royalty should be taxable, raising concerns about disclosure and revenue neutrality. The tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit, subject to compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>