<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1024 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249988</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI recalled an ex-parte order due to non-prosecution, allowing the restoration of appeals. However, the condonation of delay applications, citing departmental approval process as the reason for a 413-day delay, was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:51:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1024 - CESTAT  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249988</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI recalled an ex-parte order due to non-prosecution, allowing the restoration of appeals. However, the condonation of delay applications, citing departmental approval process as the reason for a 413-day delay, was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>