<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1022 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249986</link>
    <description>The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE depended on production of the prescribed certificate from the Project Implementing Authority. As the certificate was not produced before the adjudicating authority or the Tribunal, the condition precedent for exemption remained unfulfilled, so the duty demand and consequential interest were upheld. The penalty was, however, treated as excessive in view of the appellant&#039;s disclosure of its claim and prior payment, and was reduced on equitable considerations, granting partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1022 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249986</link>
      <description>The exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-CE depended on production of the prescribed certificate from the Project Implementing Authority. As the certificate was not produced before the adjudicating authority or the Tribunal, the condition precedent for exemption remained unfulfilled, so the duty demand and consequential interest were upheld. The penalty was, however, treated as excessive in view of the appellant&#039;s disclosure of its claim and prior payment, and was reduced on equitable considerations, granting partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>