<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1020 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the Service Contract under Works Contract Service and found the appellants eligible for the Composition Scheme under the Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. The Commissioner&#039;s orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1020 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the Service Contract under Works Contract Service and found the appellants eligible for the Composition Scheme under the Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules, 2007. The Commissioner&#039;s orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>