<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1012 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249976</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled on the appellants&#039; request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for adjudged dues related to service tax demands. The first appellant&#039;s arguments against being classified under cargo handling service were dismissed, with the Tribunal finding prima facie evidence supporting the service tax liability. Despite citing financial hardships, a pre-deposit amount was directed based on the balance sheet. The second appellant, a sub-contractor, was granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for service tax demands and penalties, considering their belief in no liability based on an agreement with the main contractor and a Board circular until 2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1012 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249976</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore ruled on the appellants&#039; request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for adjudged dues related to service tax demands. The first appellant&#039;s arguments against being classified under cargo handling service were dismissed, with the Tribunal finding prima facie evidence supporting the service tax liability. Despite citing financial hardships, a pre-deposit amount was directed based on the balance sheet. The second appellant, a sub-contractor, was granted a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for service tax demands and penalties, considering their belief in no liability based on an agreement with the main contractor and a Board circular until 2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>