<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 1008 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, considering the value of material and consumables in the calculation, rejecting the appellants&#039; argument for exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST. However, the demand beyond the normal limitation period was set aside as the appellants had disclosed their payment structure to the Revenue earlier. Penalties were dismissed due to the lack of intent to evade payment and the appellants&#039; cooperation during audits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 1008 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax, considering the value of material and consumables in the calculation, rejecting the appellants&#039; argument for exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST. However, the demand beyond the normal limitation period was set aside as the appellants had disclosed their payment structure to the Revenue earlier. Penalties were dismissed due to the lack of intent to evade payment and the appellants&#039; cooperation during audits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>