<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 998 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249962</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the applicant on all three issues, affirming the legitimacy of the partnership for business purposes and the classification of immovable properties as stock in trade. The judgment emphasized the legal principles governing the valuation of assets in the context of firm dissolution and the importance of market value considerations in such scenarios.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 998 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249962</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the applicant on all three issues, affirming the legitimacy of the partnership for business purposes and the classification of immovable properties as stock in trade. The judgment emphasized the legal principles governing the valuation of assets in the context of firm dissolution and the importance of market value considerations in such scenarios.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>