<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (7) TMI 988 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of verifying the genuineness of certificates and granting deductions under section 54F based on valid documentation and evidence. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s order and shifted the burden to the AO to verify the certificate furnished by the Municipality, ultimately allowing the claim under section 54F for the construction of the residential house.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 08:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=360791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (7) TMI 988 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of verifying the genuineness of certificates and granting deductions under section 54F based on valid documentation and evidence. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s order and shifted the burden to the AO to verify the certificate furnished by the Municipality, ultimately allowing the claim under section 54F for the construction of the residential house.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=249952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>